AI-Inferred Personality Profiles of Occupations: Implications for Career Counselling and AI Literacy
Abstract
This study examines whether artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots or “AIs” provide accurate personality profiles of occupations for career-exploring students and whether these profiles contain gender stereotypes. Although it is well known that AIs contain inaccurate data and gender stereotypes, similar to the human linguistic data it is based on, this is the first study of inaccuracies and bias in AI-inferred personality traits associated with occupations. GPT-4, Claude 3, and Gemini 1.0’s inferences of Big Five personality traits of 92 occupations were compared with human expert analysis of the Big Five personality traits important for these jobs, derived from the O*NET Work Styles (Wilmot & Ones, 2021). Ten of 15 analyses of variance comparing AI and expert ratings were significant (p < .05), indicating selective accuracy. We also found seven significant oneway analyses of variance (ANOVAs) between the AI inferences and the occupations coded as female-dominant, male-dominant, or gender-balanced based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data (2023). Inaccuracies such as AI omissions of the Low category for Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability—and bias such as replication of gender stereotypes about women’s personality traits—lead us to advocate for providing AI literacy training in career counselling to educate students about problems with using AI chatbots to provide personality profiles of occupations during career exploration.
Full text article
References
Anni, K., Vainik, U., & Mõttus, R. (2025). Personality profiles of 263 occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 110(4), 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001249
Anthropic. (2026). Claude [Large language model]. https://claude.aiAnthropic. (2024, June 8). Claude’s character. https://www.anthropic.com/research/claude-character
Assouline, M., & Meir, E. I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90046-7
Attridge, M. (2025, April 28). Survey: The economy, AI have 2025 grads worried for their careers. BestColleges. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/the-economy-ai-have-grads-worried-about-careers/
Bankins, S., Jooss, S., Restubog, S. L. D., Marrone, M., Ocampo, A. C., & Shoss, M. (2024). Navigating career stages in the age of artificial intelligence: A systematic interdisciplinary review and agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 153, Article 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104011
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Career Services at University of Wisconsin-Madison. (n.d.). Artificial Intelligence (AI) career toolkit. https://careers.wisc.edu/artificial-intelligence-career-toolkit/
Clark, R., & DeYoung, C. (2014). Creativity and the aspects of Neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.224
Common Crawl Foundation. (2026). Common Crawl: Open repository of web crawl data. Amazon Web Services Registry of Open Data. https://registry.opendata.aws/commoncrawl/
Derner, E., Kučera, D., Oliver, N., & Zahálka, J. (2024). Can ChatGPT read who you are? Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), Article 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100088
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
Dorceus, S., Le Corff, Y., & Yergeau, E. (2024). Description des principaux construits psychologiques évalués et instruments psychométriques utilisés par les conseillères et conseillers d’orientation québécois [The main psychological constructs assessed and psychometric instruments used by Quebec guidance counsellors]. Canadian Journal of Career Development, 23(2), 107–148. https://doi.org/10.53379/cjcd.2024.394
Duan, W., McNeese, N., & Li, L. (2025). Gender stereotypes toward non-gendered generative AI: The role of gendered expertise and gendered linguistic cues. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 1–35, Article GROUP18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701197
Eze, P., Alabi, A., & Osunbunmi, I. (2025). AI-driven career guidance: Comparing Nigerian undergraduate and postgraduate perceptions. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00900-0
Fan, J., Sun, T., Liu, J., Zhao, T., Zhang, B., Chen, Z., Glorioso, M., & Hack, E. (2023). How well can an AI chatbot infer personality? Examining psychometric properties of machine-inferred personality scores. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(8), 1277–1299. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001082
Freeman, J. (2025). Student generative AI Survey 2025 (HEPI Policy Note 61). Higher Education Policy Institute. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/reports/student-generative-ai-survey-2025/
Furnham, A. (2001). Vocational preference and P–O fit: reflections on Holland’s theory of vocational choice. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00046
Gagandeep, Kaur, J., Mathur, S., Kaur, S., Nayyar, A., Singh, S. P., & Mathur, S. (2024). Evaluating and mitigating gender bias in machine learning based resume filtering. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(9), 26599–26619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16552-x
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
Google. (n.d.). Career Dreamer. https://grow.google/career-dreamer/home/
Google. (2023). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. Google. https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemini/gemini_1_report.pdf
Gross, N. (2023). What ChatGPT tells us about gender: A cautionary tale about performativity and gender biases in AI. Social Sciences, 12(8), Article 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080435
Grunenberg, E., Peters, H., Francis, M. J., Back, M. D., & Matz, S. C. (2024). Machine learning in recruiting: Predicting personality from CVs and short text responses. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 1, Article 1290295. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2023.1290295
Hibbert, M., Altman, E., Shippen, T., & Wright, M. (2024, June 3). A framework for AI literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/a-framework-for-ai-literacy
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
Hoorens, V. (2014). Positivity bias. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 4938–4941). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2219
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38, Article 248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
Jussim, L., Stevens, S. T., & Honeycutt, N. (2020). The accuracy of stereotypes about personality. In T. D. Letzring & J. S. Spain (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of accurate personality judgment (pp. 245–257). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190912529.013.16
Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. Q. (2023). Gender bias and stereotypes in large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (pp. 12–24). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615599
Lang, J., & Catrino, J. (2024). How students should not use generative AI in the job search. NACE Journal. https://www.naceweb.org/career-development/best-practices/how-students-should-not-use-generative-ai-inthe-job-search
Lin, Z. (2026). A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, 58(8) Article 216. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03073-2
Löckenhoff, C. E., Chan, W., McCrae, R. R., De Fruyt, F., Jussim, L., De Bolle, M., Costa, P. T., Jr., Sutin, A. R., Realo, A., Allik, J., Nakazato, K., Shimonaka, Y., Hřebíčková, M., Graf, S., Yik, M., Ficková, E., Brunner Sciarra, M., Leibovich de Figueora, N., Schmidt, V., … Terracciano, A. (2014). Gender stereotypes of personality: Universal and accurate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113520075
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Vol. 1. Personality theories and models (pp. 273–294). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n13
Mujtaba, D. F., & Mahapatra, N. R. (2024). Fairness in AI-driven recruitment: Challenges, metrics, methods, and future directions [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.19699
National Center for O*NET Development. (n.d.). O*NET OnLine. https://www.onetonline.org/
Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2017). Interest congruence and performance: Revisiting recent meta-analytic findings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.11.002
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT [Large language model]. https://www/chatgpt.com
Pandya, S. S., & Wang, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in career development: A scoping review. Human Resource Development International, 27(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2336881
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087176
Sokanu Interactive Inc. (2025.). CareerExplorer. https://www.careerexplorer.com/
Tippins, N. T., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2010). A database for a changing economy: Review of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12814
University of Colorado Boulder. (2025). AI for career readiness. https://www.colorado.edu/career/job-searching/ai-resource-guide
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Women in the labor force: A databook (Report No. 1103). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2022/
Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2021). Occupational characteristics moderate personality–performance relations in major occupational groups. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, Article 103655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103655
Wilson, M., Robertson, P., Cruickshank, P., & Gkatzia, D. (2022). Opportunities and risks in the use of AI in career development practice. Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling, 48(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.4807
Xiao, Y., & Zheng, L. (2025). Can ChatGPT boost students’ employment confidence? A pioneering booster for career readiness. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), Article 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030362
Xue, J., Wang, Y.-C., Wei, C., Liu, X., Woo, J., & Kuo, C.-C. J. (2023). Bias and fairness in chatbots: An overview [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08836
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Jeanine Williamson, Steven D. Milewski (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright in the article is vested with the Authors' under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International - Creative Commons International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Under this license:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Canadian Journal of Career Development right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.