Explorer les alternatives au doctorat universitaire pour les chercheurs-praticiens : un récit autoethnographique

Auteurs-es

  • Kieron Chadwick University of Staffordshire

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.82396/cjcd.v25i1.3283

Mots-clés :

Auto-ethnographie, doctorat professionnel, apprentissage en milieu professionnel, culture de la recherche, perception académique, identité professionnelle

Résumé

Cet article explore les diplômes de doctorat non universitaires comme voie alternative vers le doctorat pour les chercheurs praticiens et les professionnels de l'industrie qui se tournent vers le monde universitaire. À travers une approche autoethnographique, l'auteur revient sur son parcours personnel dans l'obtention d'un diplôme de niveau 8 au Royaume-Uni, offrant ainsi un point de vue privilégié sur les motivations, les obstacles et les perceptions rencontrés. L'étude révèle une connaissance limitée et un préjugé académique à l'égard de ces diplômes, malgré leur conception flexible et orientée vers la pratique qui correspond bien aux besoins des professionnels en milieu de carrière. Les résultats soulignent le potentiel des diplômes de doctorat non universitaires pour soutenir le développement professionnel, tout en identifiant la nécessité d'une plus grande normalisation afin d'améliorer leur légitimité et leur comparabilité avec les doctorats traditionnels tels que le PhD et le DBA. Ce travail apporte un éclairage original sur une voie doctorale rarement examinée, élargissant les discussions autour des doctorats professionnels et plaidant en faveur d'une reconnaissance académique inclusive de l'expertise issue de l'industrie. En reliant l'expérience vécue à des structures éducatives plus larges, l'étude remet en question les normes dominantes en matière de diplômes et appelle à un changement culturel dans la perception académique.

Références

Abdelaal, G. (2020). Coping with imposter syndrome in academia and research. The Biochemist, 42(3), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1042/BIO20200033

Adams, T., & Manning, J. (2015). Autoethnography and family research. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 7(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12116

Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449

APIIT. (2024). APIIT International Research Conference 2024. https://apiit.lk/research/apiit-international-research-conference-2024

Arnout, B., Rahman, D., Elprince, M., Abada, A., & Jasim, K. (2020). Ethnographic research method for psychological and medical studies in light of COVID-19 pandemic outbreak: Theoretical approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(4), e2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2404

Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge.

Berg, G. A. (2016). The dissertation process and mentor relationships for African American and Latina/o students in an online program. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1227191

Blackler, A., & Miller, E. (2021). How to be a design academic. CRC Press.

Bothello, J., & Roulet, T. (2018). The imposter syndrome, or the misrepresentation of self in academic life. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 854–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12344

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2011). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs, and incomes. Oxford University Press.

Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as a method. Routledge.

Choi, S., Park, J., & Woo, K. (2024). Analysis of nursing doctoral dissertation formats over a decade: A comparative research between traditional and publication format at a university. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 30(2), 101–112. http://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2024.30.2.101

Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. Academic Press.

Coughlin, T. (2024). The twenty-first century PhD. In The Idea of the PhD: The doctorate in the twenty-first-century imagination. Routledge.

Dunlap, J. (2024). Doctoral degrees: Which one is right for you? Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 20(5), 104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2024.104987

Ellis, C., Adams, T., & Bochner, A. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294

Adams, E., & Neary, J. (2022). Strengthening the role of training needs analysis in doctoral training. Economic and Social Research Council. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Strengthening-the-role-of-TNA-Report-April-2022.pdf

Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social science. Blackwell.

Gautam, G. (2016). Ethnography as an inquiry process in social science research. Tribhuvan University Journal, 19(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v29i1.25670

Germain-Alamartine, E. R., Ahoba-Sam, S., Moghadam-Saman, G., & Evers, J. (2021). Doctoral graduates’ transition to industry: Networks as a mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2680–2695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783

GOV.UK. (2024). Find a regulated qualification. https://www.gov.uk/find-a-regulated-qualification

Hambrick, R. (1997). The identity, purpose, and future of doctoral education. Journal of Public Administration Education, 3(2), 133–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215166

Hollweck, T., Netolicky, D., & Campbell, P. (2022). Pracademia: Exploring the possibilities, power, and politics of boundary-spanners straddling the worlds of practice and scholarship. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2022-103

Horta, H. (2018). PhD students’ self-perception of skills and career plans while in doctoral programs: Are they associated? Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 211–228. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9532-y

Horta, H., & Chan, S. (2023). Why do students pursue a doctorate in the era of the ‘PhD crisis’? Evidence from Taiwan. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(2), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12467

Jacobs, R., Heuvelman, A., Tan, M., & Peters, O. (2012). Digital movie piracy: A perspective on downloading behavior through social cognitive theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 958–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.017

Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. Monash University Press.

Jones, S., & Adams, T. (2010). Autoethnography is a queer method. In C.J. Nash (Ed), Queer Methods and Methodologies. Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research (pp. 100–120). Routledge.

Jonker, L., Fisher, S., & Dagnan, D. (2019). Patients admitted to more research-active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: Results from a retrospective cross-sectional study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26, 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13118

Khuram, S. (2024). The role of business school culture in building the non-PhD faculty’s research attitudes and intention toward doctoral education. International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100923

Khuram, S., Rehman, C.A., Nasir, N., & Elahi, N.S. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of quality assurance in higher education institutions: Implications for assessing universities’ societal impact. Evaluation and Program Planning, 99, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102319

Kopotev, M., Rostovtsev, A., Sokolov, M. (2021). Shifting the Norm: The Case of Academic Plagiarism Detection. In: Gritsenko, D., Wijermars, M., Kopotev, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_27

Lee, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Cefa Sari, B. (2022). A systematic literature review on technology in online doctoral education. Studies in Continuing Education, 46(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2135499

Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006

Li, H., & Horta, H. (2022). Factors influencing PhD students’ intentions to pursue careers in the government and nonprofit sectors: Evidence from a global survey. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1946–1961. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1948975

Li, H., & Horta, H. (2023). Exploring the identity development of PhD graduates transitioning to non-researcher roles. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(2), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12452

MacIntosh, R., Mason, K., Beech, N., & Bartunek, J.M. (2021). Delivering impact in management research, when does it really happen? Routledge.

Mattijssen, L.J.E., Bergmans, I.C.M., & Van der Weijden, J.C. (2020). In the eye of the storm: The mental health situation of PhD candidates. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10(2), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00639-4

Mayor, X. (2016). Analytic or evocative: A forgotten discussion in autoethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2432

McIlveen, P. (2008). Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/103841620801700204

Mendez-Lopez, M. (2014). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations, and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09

Mirick, R.G., & Wladkowski, S.P. (2020). Women’s experiences with parenting during doctoral education: Impact on career trajectory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 89-110. https://doi.org/10.28945/4484

Mosanya, M. (2021). Buffering academic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic related social isolation: Grit and growth mindset as protective factors against the impact of loneliness. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00043-7

Next Level Impact. (2024). CMI Level 8 strategic direction and leadership. https://www.nextlevelimpact.com/cmi-level-8-strategic-direction-and-leadership

Ngunjiri, F., Hernandez, K., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), Article M1. https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/241.html

Nwosu, H., Obidike, P.C., Ugwu, J.N., Udeze, C.C., & Okolie, U.C. (2022). Applying social cognitive theory to placement learning in business firms and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. International Journal of Management in Education, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100602

OTHM Qualifications. (2024). OTHM Level 8 diploma in strategic management and leadership practice. https://othm.org.uk/qualification/othm-level-8-diploma-in-strategic-management-and-leadership-practice

Owens, L. (2017). Reflections of a pracademic: A journey from social work practitioner to academic. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 22(1), 37-43. https://reflectionsnarrativesofprofessionalhelping.org/index.php/Reflections/article/view/1410

Ploder, A., & Stadlbauer, J. (2016). Strong reflexivity and its critics: Responses to autoethnography in the German-speaking cultural and social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658067

Primeau, L. (2003). Reflections on self in qualitative research: Stories of family. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.9

Qualifi. (2024). Qualifi Level 8 diploma in strategic management and leadership. https://qualifi.net/qualifi-level-8-diploma-in-strategic-management-and-leadership

Rambo, C., & Ellis, C. (2020). Autoethnography. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology (pp. 200–215). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa082.pub2

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Servage, L. (2009). Alternative and professional doctoral programs: What is driving the demand? Studies in Higher Education, 34, 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902818761

Skakni, I. (2018). Reasons, motives, and motivations for completing a PhD: A typology of doctoral studies as a quest. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00004

Suomi, K., Kuoppakangas, P., & Kivistö, J. (2020). Exploring doctorate holders’ perceptions of the non-academic labour market and reputational problems they relate to their employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 26, 397–414. http://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11233-020-09061-1

Terentev, E., Rybakov, N., & Bednyi, B. (2020). Why embark on a PhD today? A typology of motives for doctoral study in Russia. Educational Studies Moscow, 1, 40–69. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-40-69

Wall, S. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500205

Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103

Watson, J., Robertson, S., Ryan, T., et al. (2024). Understanding the value of a doctorate for allied health professionals in practice in the UK: A survey. BMC Health Services Research, 24, 566. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11035-7

Williams, J., Sicard, K., Lundstrom, A., & Hart, S. (2021). Overcoming barriers to PhD education in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 60(7), 400–403. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20210616-08

Williams, P.E., Wall, N., & Fish, W. (2019). Mid-career adult learners in an online doctoral program and the drivers of their academic self-regulation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3789

Winn, M., MacDonald, P., & Zietsma, C. (2008). Managing industry reputation: The dynamic tension between collective and competitive reputation management strategies. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.4

Woodley, H. (2016). The use of autoethnography in classroom-based practitioner research. Australian Review of Educational Research, 13(1), 44–56. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/researchwebsites/arecls/Helen%20Woodley.pdf

Zhuchkova, S., & Terentev, E. (2024). Non-linear path to a doctorate: A comparison of direct- and indirect-pathway doctoral students at Russian universities. Higher Education, 87, 1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01087-9

Stéthoscope de médecin posé seul sur la table.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2026-01-23

Comment citer

Chadwick, K. (2026). Explorer les alternatives au doctorat universitaire pour les chercheurs-praticiens : un récit autoethnographique. La Revue Canadienne De développement De carrière, 25(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.82396/cjcd.v25i1.3283

Numéro

Rubrique

Pratiques exemplaires pour les intervenants et la communauté