Exploring Non-University Doctoral Alternatives for Scholar‑Practitioners: An Autoethnographic Account
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.82396/cjcd.v25i1.3283Keywords:
Autoethnography, professional doctorate, work-based learning, research culture, academic perception, professional identityAbstract
This paper explores non-university doctoral qualifications as an alternative doctoral pathway for scholar practitioners and industry professionals transitioning into academia. Through an autoethnographic approach, the author reflects on their personal journey pursuing a UK-based Level 8 diploma, providing an insider perspective on motivations, barriers, and perceptions encountered. The study reveals limited awareness and academic bias against these qualifications, despite their flexible, practice-oriented design that aligns well with the needs of mid-career professionals. Findings highlight the potential of non-university doctoral qualifications to support professional development, also identifying the need for greater standardisation to improve their legitimacy and comparability with traditional doctorates such as the PhD and DBA. This work contributes original insight into a rarely examined doctoral route, broadening discussions around professional doctorates and advocating for inclusive academic recognition of industry-informed expertise. By linking lived experience with broader educational structures, the study challenges dominant credential norms and calls for cultural shifts in academic perception.
References
Abdelaal, G. (2020). Coping with imposter syndrome in academia and research. The Biochemist, 42(3), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1042/BIO20200033
Adams, T., & Manning, J. (2015). Autoethnography and family research. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 7(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12116
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
APIIT. (2024). APIIT International Research Conference 2024. https://apiit.lk/research/apiit-international-research-conference-2024
Arnout, B., Rahman, D., Elprince, M., Abada, A., & Jasim, K. (2020). Ethnographic research method for psychological and medical studies in light of COVID-19 pandemic outbreak: Theoretical approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(4), e2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2404
Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge.
Berg, G. A. (2016). The dissertation process and mentor relationships for African American and Latina/o students in an online program. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1227191
Blackler, A., & Miller, E. (2021). How to be a design academic. CRC Press.
Bothello, J., & Roulet, T. (2018). The imposter syndrome, or the misrepresentation of self in academic life. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 854–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12344
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2011). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs, and incomes. Oxford University Press.
Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as a method. Routledge.
Choi, S., Park, J., & Woo, K. (2024). Analysis of nursing doctoral dissertation formats over a decade: A comparative research between traditional and publication format at a university. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 30(2), 101–112. http://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2024.30.2.101
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. Academic Press.
Coughlin, T. (2024). The twenty-first century PhD. In The Idea of the PhD: The doctorate in the twenty-first-century imagination. Routledge.
Dunlap, J. (2024). Doctoral degrees: Which one is right for you? Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 20(5), 104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2024.104987
Ellis, C., Adams, T., & Bochner, A. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294
Adams, E., & Neary, J. (2022). Strengthening the role of training needs analysis in doctoral training. Economic and Social Research Council. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Strengthening-the-role-of-TNA-Report-April-2022.pdf
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social science. Blackwell.
Gautam, G. (2016). Ethnography as an inquiry process in social science research. Tribhuvan University Journal, 19(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v29i1.25670
Germain-Alamartine, E. R., Ahoba-Sam, S., Moghadam-Saman, G., & Evers, J. (2021). Doctoral graduates’ transition to industry: Networks as a mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2680–2695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783
GOV.UK. (2024). Find a regulated qualification. https://www.gov.uk/find-a-regulated-qualification
Hambrick, R. (1997). The identity, purpose, and future of doctoral education. Journal of Public Administration Education, 3(2), 133–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215166
Hollweck, T., Netolicky, D., & Campbell, P. (2022). Pracademia: Exploring the possibilities, power, and politics of boundary-spanners straddling the worlds of practice and scholarship. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2022-103
Horta, H. (2018). PhD students’ self-perception of skills and career plans while in doctoral programs: Are they associated? Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 211–228. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9532-y
Horta, H., & Chan, S. (2023). Why do students pursue a doctorate in the era of the ‘PhD crisis’? Evidence from Taiwan. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(2), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12467
Jacobs, R., Heuvelman, A., Tan, M., & Peters, O. (2012). Digital movie piracy: A perspective on downloading behavior through social cognitive theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 958–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.017
Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. Monash University Press.
Jones, S., & Adams, T. (2010). Autoethnography is a queer method. In C.J. Nash (Ed), Queer Methods and Methodologies. Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research (pp. 100–120). Routledge.
Jonker, L., Fisher, S., & Dagnan, D. (2019). Patients admitted to more research-active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: Results from a retrospective cross-sectional study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26, 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13118
Khuram, S. (2024). The role of business school culture in building the non-PhD faculty’s research attitudes and intention toward doctoral education. International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100923
Khuram, S., Rehman, C.A., Nasir, N., & Elahi, N.S. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of quality assurance in higher education institutions: Implications for assessing universities’ societal impact. Evaluation and Program Planning, 99, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102319
Kopotev, M., Rostovtsev, A., Sokolov, M. (2021). Shifting the Norm: The Case of Academic Plagiarism Detection. In: Gritsenko, D., Wijermars, M., Kopotev, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_27
Lee, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Cefa Sari, B. (2022). A systematic literature review on technology in online doctoral education. Studies in Continuing Education, 46(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2135499
Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006
Li, H., & Horta, H. (2022). Factors influencing PhD students’ intentions to pursue careers in the government and nonprofit sectors: Evidence from a global survey. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1946–1961. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1948975
Li, H., & Horta, H. (2023). Exploring the identity development of PhD graduates transitioning to non-researcher roles. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(2), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12452
MacIntosh, R., Mason, K., Beech, N., & Bartunek, J.M. (2021). Delivering impact in management research, when does it really happen? Routledge.
Mattijssen, L.J.E., Bergmans, I.C.M., & Van der Weijden, J.C. (2020). In the eye of the storm: The mental health situation of PhD candidates. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10(2), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00639-4
Mayor, X. (2016). Analytic or evocative: A forgotten discussion in autoethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2432
McIlveen, P. (2008). Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/103841620801700204
Mendez-Lopez, M. (2014). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations, and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09
Mirick, R.G., & Wladkowski, S.P. (2020). Women’s experiences with parenting during doctoral education: Impact on career trajectory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 89-110. https://doi.org/10.28945/4484
Mosanya, M. (2021). Buffering academic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic related social isolation: Grit and growth mindset as protective factors against the impact of loneliness. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00043-7
Next Level Impact. (2024). CMI Level 8 strategic direction and leadership. https://www.nextlevelimpact.com/cmi-level-8-strategic-direction-and-leadership
Ngunjiri, F., Hernandez, K., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), Article M1. https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/241.html
Nwosu, H., Obidike, P.C., Ugwu, J.N., Udeze, C.C., & Okolie, U.C. (2022). Applying social cognitive theory to placement learning in business firms and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. International Journal of Management in Education, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100602
OTHM Qualifications. (2024). OTHM Level 8 diploma in strategic management and leadership practice. https://othm.org.uk/qualification/othm-level-8-diploma-in-strategic-management-and-leadership-practice
Owens, L. (2017). Reflections of a pracademic: A journey from social work practitioner to academic. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 22(1), 37-43. https://reflectionsnarrativesofprofessionalhelping.org/index.php/Reflections/article/view/1410
Ploder, A., & Stadlbauer, J. (2016). Strong reflexivity and its critics: Responses to autoethnography in the German-speaking cultural and social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658067
Primeau, L. (2003). Reflections on self in qualitative research: Stories of family. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.9
Qualifi. (2024). Qualifi Level 8 diploma in strategic management and leadership. https://qualifi.net/qualifi-level-8-diploma-in-strategic-management-and-leadership
Rambo, C., & Ellis, C. (2020). Autoethnography. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology (pp. 200–215). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa082.pub2
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
Servage, L. (2009). Alternative and professional doctoral programs: What is driving the demand? Studies in Higher Education, 34, 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902818761
Skakni, I. (2018). Reasons, motives, and motivations for completing a PhD: A typology of doctoral studies as a quest. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00004
Suomi, K., Kuoppakangas, P., & Kivistö, J. (2020). Exploring doctorate holders’ perceptions of the non-academic labour market and reputational problems they relate to their employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 26, 397–414. http://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11233-020-09061-1
Terentev, E., Rybakov, N., & Bednyi, B. (2020). Why embark on a PhD today? A typology of motives for doctoral study in Russia. Educational Studies Moscow, 1, 40–69. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-40-69
Wall, S. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500205
Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103
Watson, J., Robertson, S., Ryan, T., et al. (2024). Understanding the value of a doctorate for allied health professionals in practice in the UK: A survey. BMC Health Services Research, 24, 566. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11035-7
Williams, J., Sicard, K., Lundstrom, A., & Hart, S. (2021). Overcoming barriers to PhD education in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 60(7), 400–403. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20210616-08
Williams, P.E., Wall, N., & Fish, W. (2019). Mid-career adult learners in an online doctoral program and the drivers of their academic self-regulation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3789
Winn, M., MacDonald, P., & Zietsma, C. (2008). Managing industry reputation: The dynamic tension between collective and competitive reputation management strategies. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.4
Woodley, H. (2016). The use of autoethnography in classroom-based practitioner research. Australian Review of Educational Research, 13(1), 44–56. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/researchwebsites/arecls/Helen%20Woodley.pdf
Zhuchkova, S., & Terentev, E. (2024). Non-linear path to a doctorate: A comparison of direct- and indirect-pathway doctoral students at Russian universities. Higher Education, 87, 1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01087-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kieron Chadwick

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright in the article is vested with the Authors' under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International - Creative Commons International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Under this license:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Canadian Journal of Career Development right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.










CERIC funds projects to develop innovative programs, resources, publications and events. 
