The Relational Career Values of Post-secondary Women Students


  • Sharon Crozier University of Calgary
  • Cynthia Dorval Private Practice Psychologist


women, students, post-secondary, career values


This qualitative research explores the underlying relational meaning of the career values of women students in traditional and nontraditional university faculties. Values such as achievement, concern for others, responsibility, financial prosperity, belonging, concern for the environment, and spirituality were important for both groups of women to have satisfied in the career for which they were studying/training. Relational themes were found for both groups. Some relational themes were obvious such as helping others but other values, such as achievement also held relational meaning. Interesting are some of the relational connotations that emerged adding new dimensions to commonly accepted “work” values. Some expected differences between women in traditional and nontraditional faculties were found but also many similarities in the expectation that relational values will be satisfied in their future careers.


Ambrose, S., Lazarus, B., & Nair, I. (1998). No universal constants: Journeys of women in engineering and computer science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87 (4), 363- 383.

Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Ben-Shem, I., & Avi-Itzhak, T. (1991). On work values and career choice in freshmen students: The case of helping vs. other professions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 369-379.

Betz, N., & Fitzgerald, L. (1987). The career psychology of women. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Brooks, L. (1990). Recent developments in theory building. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed.) (pp. 364-394). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, D. (1996). Brown’s values based, holistic model of career and life-role choices and satisfaction. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed.) (pp.337-372). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, D., & Crace, R. (1996). The Life Values Inventory professional manual. Chapel Hill, NC: Life Values Resources.

Chatterjee, J., & McCarrey, M. (1991). Sex-role attitudes, values and instrumental-expressive traits of women trainees in traditional vs. non-traditional programmes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40 (3), 281-297.

Crozier, S. (1999). Women’s career development in a “relational context”. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 21, 231-247.

Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Routledge.

Di Dio, L., Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., & Aube, J. (1996). Linking personal values to gender. Sex Roles, 34, 621-636.

Dorval, C. (1999). Relational values in women’s career role. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.

Eccles, J. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-172.

Eccles, J. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.

Forrest, L., & Mikolaitis, N. (1986). The relational component of identity: An expansion of career development theory. Career Development Quarterly, 35, 76-88.

Gallos, J. (1989). Exploring women’s development: Implications for career theory, practice, and research. In M. Arthur, D. Hall, & B. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 110-132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 34 (3), 223-237.

Giordano, F. (1995). The whole person at work: An integrative vocational intervention model for women’s workplace issues. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 20 (1), 4- 13.

Hashizume, L., & Crozier, S. (1994). A female definition of career achievement. In J. Gallivan, S. Crozier, & V. Lalande (Eds.). Women, girls and achievement. North York, ON: Captus Press.

Hendrix, V., & Super, D. (1968). Factor dimensions and reliability of the Work Values Inventory. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 17, 269-274.

Jagacinski, C.M. (1987). Androgyny in a male-dominated field: The relationship of sex-typed traits to performance and satisfaction in engineering. Sex Roles, 17, 529-547.

Jones, S. (1997). Voices of identity and difference: A qualitative exploration of the multiple dimensions of identity development in women college students. Journal of College Student Development, 38 (4), 376-385.

Jordan, J., Kaplan, A., Miller, J., Stiver, I., & Surrey, J. (Eds.). (1991). Women’s growth in connection: Writings from the stone center. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Josselson, R. (1987). Finding herself: Pathways to identity development in women. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

Lalande, V., Crozier, S., & Davey, H. (1998). Women’s career development and relationships: A qualitative inquiry. Paper presented at the annual conference of NATCON, Ottawa, ON.

Lavallee, M., & Pelletier, R. (1992). Ecological value of Bem’s gender schema theory explored through females’traditional and nontraditional occupational contexts. Psychological Reports, 70, 79-82.

Lipman-Blumen, J., Handley-Isaksen, A., &Leavitt, H. (1983). Achieving styles in men and women: A model, an instrument, and some findings. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 147-204). San Francisco: Freeman.

Marshall, J. (1989). Re-visioning career concepts: A feminist invitation. In M. Arthur, D. Hall, & B. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 275-291). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

McConatha, J.T., & Schnell, F. (1997). A cross-generational and gender comparison of value priorities of adults living in the U.S. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 34 (1), 27-35.

Miller, J.B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Nevitte, N., Gibbins, R., & Codding, P. (1990). The career goals of female science students in Canada. In M. Gosztonyi-Ainley (Ed.), Despite the odds: Essays on Canadian women and science (pp.284-303). Montreal, QC: Vehicule Press.

Padilla, R. (1990). HyperQual Version 3.0 [Computer Program]. Chandler, AZ: Author. (Address: 3327 N. Dakota, Chandler, AZ 85224 U.S.A.).

Patton, W., & McMahon, M. (1999). Career development and systems theory: A new relationship. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Perron, J., & St-Onge, L. (1991). Work values in relation to gender and forecasted career patterns for women. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 14, 79- 90.

Phillips, S., & Imhoff, A. (1997). Women and career development: A decade of research. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 31-59.

Polit, D., & Hungler, B. (1999). Nursing research: Principles and methods (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

Powell, G., & Mainiero, L. (1992). Cross-currents in the river of time: conceptualizing the complexities of women’s careers. Journal of Management, 18 (2), 215-237.

Pryor, R. (1983). Sex differences in the levels of generality of values/preferences related to work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 233-241.

Richie, B., Fassinger, R., Linn, S., Johnson, J., Prosser, J., & Robinson, S. (1997). Persistence, connection, and passion: A qualitative study of the career development of highly achieving African American-Black and White women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44 (2), 133- 148.

Schuster, D. (1990). Work, relationships, and balance in the lives of gifted women. In H. Grossman, & N. Chester (Eds.), The experience and meaning of work in women’s lives (pp. 189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Skoe, E., & Diessner, R. (1994). Ethic of care, justice, identity, and gender: An extension and replication. MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 40 (2), 272-289.

Stonewater, B.B. (1988). Gender differences in career decision-making: A theoretical integration. Initiatives, 12, 27-34.

Subotnik, R.F., & Arnold, K. D. (1996). Success and sacrifice: The costs of talent fulfillment for women in science. In K. Arnold, K. Noble, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 263-280). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Super, D. (1957). The psychology of careers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Super, D. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282-298.

Super, D. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 197- 261). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

Super, D., Savickas, M., & Super, C. (1996). The life-span, life-space approach to careers. In D. Brown, D. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed.) (pp. 121-178). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Young, R., & Richards, R. (1992). Entrepreneurial women and the relational component of identity: A hermeneutical study of career. In R. Young, & A. Collin (Eds.),

Interpreting career: Hermeneutical studies of lives in context (pp. 117- 133). Westport, CT: Praeger/ Greenwood.




How to Cite

Crozier, S., & Dorval, C. (2002). The Relational Career Values of Post-secondary Women Students. Canadian Journal of Career Development, 1(1), 3–9. Retrieved from