Structurations rivales des ancres de carrière : Un test empirique du circumplex
Mots-clés :
ancrages de carrière, circumplex, test empiriqueRésumé
La manière d’organiser les ancres de carrière selon une logique circulaire a récemment donné naissance à plusieurs structurations rivales qui n’ont pu être validées empiriquement. Contrairement à ces structurations athéoriques, un modèle théorique de structuration est proposé. En utilisant la technique statistique de Browne (1992), il s’avère que le modèle théorique est supérieur aux autres structurations. Les résultats obtenus sont aussi en accord avec une structuration par quadrants regroupant des ancres de carrière compatibles. Le quadrant du carriériste se compose de l’ancre de gestion; le quadrant du protéen regroupe respectivement les ancres de compétence technique/fonctionnelle, de défis créatifs, d’entrepreneurship et d’autonomie/indépendance. Le quadrant du social rassemble les ancres de style de vie et de service/dévouement alors que le quadrant du bureaucratique fait référence à l’ancre de sécurité/stabilité.
Références
Barclay, B.W. (2009). Underlying factor structure of Schein’s career anchor model. Doctoral thesis: Brigham Young University.
Barclay, B.W., Chapman, J.R., & Brown, B.L. (2013). Underlying Factor Structure of Schein’s Career Anchor Model. Journal of Career Assessment, 3, 430-451. DOI:0.1177/1069072712475179
Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Mahwah: IEA.
Bristow, N.J. A. (2004). The Beyond Job Satisfaction Field book: Tools and Templates for Maximizing Your Engagement and Vitality at Work. Washington, D.C.: IEEE-USA.
Browne, M.W. (1992). Circumplex models for correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 57, 469-497. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294416
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230- 258.DOI: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
Cai, M. (2012). Measurement Approach to the Comparisons of Career Anchor Model. Doctoral thesis: Brigham Young University.
Chapman, J.R. (2009). A Partial Response to Feldman and Bolino’s Critique of Schein’s Career Anchor Theory. Doctoral thesis: Brigham Young University.
Churchill, G.A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Construct. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64- 73. DOI: 10.2307/3150876
Danziger, N., Rachman-Moore, D., & Valency, R.. (2008). The construct validity of Schein’s career anchors orientation inventory. Career Development International, 13, 7-19.
DOI:10.1108/13620430810849506
DeLong, T.J. (1982). Reexamining the Career Anchor Model. Personnel, 59, 50-61. Found at: http://www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/32976
Fabrigar, L.R., Visser, P.S., & Browne, M.W. (1997). Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Testing the Circumplex Structure of Data in Personality and Social Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 184-203. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023980
Feldman, D.C., & Bolino, M.C. (1996). Career Within Careers: Reconceptualizing the Nature of Career Anchors and Their Consequences. Human Resource Review, 6, 89-112. DOI:10.1016/S1053-4822(96)90014-5
Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering Statistics Using R. Los Angeles: Sage.
Grassi, M., Luccio, R., & Di Blas, L. (2010). CircC: An R implementation of Browne’s Circular Stochatic Process Model. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 55- 73. DOI:10.3758/BRM.42.1.55
Igbaria, M., Greenhaus, J.H., & Parasuraman, S. (1991). Career orientations of MIS employees: An empirical analysis. MIS Quarterly, 15, 151-169. DOI:10.2307/249376
Igbaria, M. & Baroudi, J. J. (1993) A short-form measure of career orientations: A psychometric evaluation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 131-154
Martineau, Y., Wils, T., & Tremblay, M. (2005). Multiple Career Anchors of Quebec Engineers: Impacts on Career Path and Success. Relations industrielles /Industrial Relations, 60, 455- 482. DOI: 10.7202/012155ar
Mercure, D., & Vultur, M. (2010). La signification du travail: Nouveau modèle productif et Éthos du travail au Québec. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Nordvik, H. (1991). Work Activity and Career Goals in Holland’s and Schein’s Theories of Vocational Personalities and Career Anchors. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 38, 165-178. Found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000187919190024G
Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J.-C., Cestre, G., & Valette-Florence, P. (2007). A Test of the Quasi-circumplex Structure of Human Values. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 820-840. DOI: 10.1177/0022022109354377
R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http: //www.R-project.org/.
Rodrigues, R., Guest, D., & Budjanovcanin, A. (2013). From anchors to orientations: Towards a contemporary theory of career preferences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 142-152. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.04.002
Roger, A. (2006). Développement et validation d’une échelle de mesure des orientations de carrière individuelles. 14th Congrès de psychologie du travail et des
organisations. 9 pages
Schein, E.H. (2004). Ancres de carrière: Découvrir ses véritables valeurs. Montréal: Actualisation. Schein, E.H. (1996). Career Anchors Revisited: Implications for Career Development in the 21st Century. Academy of Management, 10, 80-88. DOI:10.5465/AME.1996.3145321
Schein, E.H. (1990a). Career Anchors and Job/Role Planning. Sloan working paper, Sloan School of Management.
Schein, E.H. (1990b). Career Anchors: Discovering Your Real Values, San Diego, Ca: Pfeiffer & Company.
Schein, E.H. (1987). Individuals and Careers. in J. Lorsch (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 155-171.
Schein, E.H. (1978). Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organizational Needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Westley.
Schein, E.H. (1975). How Career Anchors Hold Executives to Their Career Paths. Personnel, 52, 11-24. Found at: http://www.ipcsit.com/vol20/49-ICAIT2011-G3039.pdf
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. Found at: http://www.sciepub.com/reference/17995
Tremblay, M., Wils, T. & Proulx, C. (2002). Determinants of career path preference among Canadian engineers. Journal of Engineering and Technical Management. 19. 1-23.
Wach, M., & Hammer, B. (2003). La structure des valeurs est-elle universelle?: Genèse et validation du modèle compréhensif de Schwartz. Paris: Harmattan.
Wils, T., Luncasu, M., & Waxin, M.- F. (2007). Développement et validation d’un modèle de structuration des valeurs au travail. Relations industrielles/Industrial/Relations, 62, 305-332. DOI: 10.7202/016090ar
Wils, L., Wils, T., & Tremblay, M. (2010). Toward a Career Anchor Structure: An Empirical Investigation of Engineers. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 65, 236-256.
DOI: 10.7202/044301ar
Wils, T., Wils, L., & Tremblay, M. (2014). Revisiting the Career Anchor Model: A Proposition and an Empirical Investigation of a New Model of Career Value Structure. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 69, 813-839. DOI:10.7202/1028113ar
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
